Biotech and pharma R&D
Research groups working with experimental data, literature, and internal protocols need to move quickly between hypothesis and evidence, without losing track of which finding came from which source, or letting a candidate result be treated as settled before a researcher has actually checked it. This page sets out how such a workflow would be planned and run on inTheEU Assist, not a record of a completed deployment.
How the workflow would be structured
Approved research material (internal experimental data, protocols, and literature the group has cleared for use) would be ingested into a project-scoped knowledge pack. An agent configured for the project would propose candidate findings, summaries, or cross-references drawn from that material, each one tied to the specific source it came from and entered with a status of proposed.
Because different projects often carry different collaborators, data-sharing terms, and confidentiality obligations, project-level isolation matters here as much as in any other regulated setting: material from one project is never visible to or reused in another.
Where human approval sits
A proposed finding or summary would move from proposed to reviewed to approved or rejected. Nothing is treated as an established result, and nothing feeds into a report, a filing, or a further experiment, until a named researcher on the project has reviewed and signed off on it.
What this draws on today, and what it does not
Project-scoped knowledge ingestion, the proposed-to-approved review lifecycle, and the signed audit chain tying a finding back to its source material and its reviewer are working parts of the platform. What is not part of this: any pre-built scientific reasoning, experimental design, or regulatory interpretation. The research judgement remains with the group's own scientists throughout; any domain-specific analysis capability would be developed alongside them, using their own data and standards, not supplied as an off-the-shelf model.
Some of the architecture underlying this capability set is documented in filings still in progress. This page describes what the platform is designed to do, at a level appropriate for planning a pilot, not an implementation specification.
Platform features and interface are subject to continuous improvement. Descriptions in this guide may not reflect the exact layout or wording of the latest released version.