See where Assist can remove repetitive work, organise evidence and sources, and prepare review-ready outputs without displacing professional authority. Each page shows the operational workflow first, then its approval boundaries and the capabilities available for a pilot. These are solution patterns, not claims of completed customer deployments.
Legal
Law firms and notarial offices
Support the matter lifecycle from intake and research to document review, chronology, evidence and source handling, due diligence, drafting support, and firm knowledge, with the lawyer always authoritative.
Financial services
Banks and fintech compliance teams
Transaction review and AML screening workflows where material actions are gated before execution. See how the approval chain and tamper-evident record would support later review.
Healthcare
Medical practices and research groups
Patient-context knowledge bases, approved protocol agents, on-premises by default. How a clinical or research workflow would be governed end to end, with every flag routed through a clinician before it counts.
Audit
CPA and audit practices
Source-to-sign-off traceability planned as a governed workflow rather than assembled as paperwork after the fact. Per-engagement isolation from day one.
Labor and compliance
Labor consultants and advisors
Contract generation, regulatory cross-reference, and compliance verification, planned around per-client case isolation and a firm's own approval chain, not a generic default.
Aerospace
Engineering and quality teams
Safety-critical sign-off planned as a sequence of gated, signed stages, each one bound to the specific review that was actually carried out, not a general permission to proceed.
Geophysics
Seismic and environmental monitoring institutions
Continuous instrument data reviewed on schedule, with every assessment held as proposed until a named scientist signs off. How a monitoring workflow would be governed end to end.
Insurance
Claims and fraud review teams
Claims review and fraud escalation planned as a signed, gated sequence, with every flag tied to the claim file it came from and no decision applied until an adjuster signs off.
Biotech and pharma R&D
Research groups and project teams
Project-scoped research knowledge, with every candidate finding held as proposed until a named researcher reviews it. How a research governance workflow would be planned and run.
Energy production
Generation and asset management teams
Telemetry from photovoltaic, wind, hydroelectric, thermal, and storage assets, compared against approved history and flagged for review, with plant control kept entirely separate.
Oil and gas
Maintenance and reliability teams
Process and inspection data from refineries, pipelines, and offshore platforms, reviewed against operating history, with process control and safety systems kept entirely separate.
Dams and hydropower
Dam safety and hydropower engineers
Structural and hydrological monitoring reviewed against approved baselines on schedule, with gate, spillway, and turbine control kept entirely separate.
Autonomous robotics
Industrial and inspection robotics teams
Findings from inspection and industrial robots reviewed and approved before any closer inspection is carried out, with motor control and safety interlocks kept entirely separate.
UAV operations
Infrastructure-inspection UAV operators
Mission findings reviewed and approved before any repositioning is requested, with flight control kept entirely separate. How a mission-governance workflow would be planned and run.
Platform features and interface are subject to continuous improvement. Descriptions in these pages may not reflect the exact layout or wording of the latest released version.